Sunday, September 30, 2012

Charlotte Appleseed


As I mentioned earlier, Chris and I spent this weekend working an Appleseed in Charlotte.  This was our first Appleseed as orange hats.  I wasn't quite sure what to expect, but we both had a blast.  We did get put on the spot, not knowing what we would be asked to go over ahead of time.  I know I would have done a bit better with even a few minutes notice, but Chris did an excellent job (then again, he did have a few minutes to think because I went first!).  Anyway, I went over the safety rules and steps to make a rifle safe as well as demonstrating steady hold factors on Day One.  Chris demonstrated sitting/kneeling positions on Day One.  Also on Saturday, we both were RSOs on the line.  Beyond that, we just basically instructed the shooters individually.

Sunday, I went over steady hold factors with Chris demonstrating, and then he reviewed the six steps of firing a shot.  He did a fantastic job!  I might be biased, but two students came up to him afterwards and said the same thing, so it's not just me.

On the history side, we just listened, but we got some good ideas on effective ways to share the Three Strikes.  Unfortunately, we had to leave early on Sunday and missed the Sunday stories.  I'm particularly sad about this as Lawrence was at this shoot and I was hoping to hear him tell a story.  He told the First Strike at our first Appleseed and it really was mind-blowing for me.  I'd always thought of history as really boring... until I heard Lawrence.  He made everything come alive.  I hope I can do as well when I start telling the stories (which should be soon!).  We thought about offering to tell a story Sunday, but had to decide against it given our need to leave at lunchtime.

On the instructional side, I think this was Chris' first time really instructing in a shooting context.  He found it to be a very rewarding experience - of course, I agree!  I did a lot of encouragement with my shooters.  Most of them were returning shooters who just needed some time to put their skills together and lock things in, while avoiding mental traps.  I did have one new shooter who I worked with.  She was very happy to see her groups tighten up over the course of the day and seemed excited to continue shooting and maybe even buy her own rifle.

Additionally, we also had the opportunity to do some shooting.  Chris shot a bit at the end of Saturday, and under strict order from Lawrence we both shot on Sunday morning.  Chris had some trouble with malfunctions but still shot better than he's ever shot with irons.  I had a scope and re-qualified as Rifleman - even though I pulled several shots that I shouldn't have pulled.  We are our own worst critics, though, I suppose!

I want to give a shout-out to all of the students on the line for being incredibly safe and very receptive to instruction.  You made our job so easy!  When I saw how many kids were on the line I was nervous, but the kids were, without exception, smart, determined, and safe.  Another shout-out to the instructors, some of whom I'd met before, others who were new to me.  You all did a fantastic job, and I learned so much from listening to you!

You know what else I learned... I learned that I want a new stock for my Ruger.  Lawrence said so!  I want this.

Christmas is coming!

Mini M1A with STANAG

I think that if someone made a M1A look-alike (similar ergonomics), chambered in 5.56, that accepted STANAG AR-15 magazines, they'd sell like hot cakes. I'd design the thing with maximum compatibility with AR and/or M1A components. Especially if it were simple to make an "AWB compliant" version for Kalifornistan and other occupied territories; lack of a pistol grip seems to make it easier. I think you could make it weigh in around 6.5 lbs making for a light, handy carbine. I like the lines, look, low sight mount, and ergonomics of the M1A, but I appreciate the light recoil and inexpensive nature of the 5.56. Lots of platforms come close but nothing quite fits the ticket:
- Ruger Mini-14: No STANAG mags. Otherwise, exactly as intended -- a "Miniature M14."
- KelTec Su-16: Comes pretty close. I just question the build quality. Classic wood furniture would be good as a cosmetic touch.
- Benelli MR1: Kind of a weird hybrid, does have a non-pistol grip option though. Super expensive compared to other options.

Too bad Ruger loves proprietary designs. I suspect that there are some mechanical issues behind it though. It might also have to do something with Bill Ruger's support for AWB type ideas.

Friday, September 28, 2012

Appleseed

A bit last minute, but we're heading out this weekend for the Charlotte Appleseed to work on our instructing techniques.  This will be our first shoot as orange hats!  Chris wanted to get one in before going on his little trip, and it's not going to hurt me one bit even though I have the Gaston shoot at the end of this month.  After action report to follow!

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Alaska and MAIG

Alaska used to have two Mayors who belonged to the Mayors Against Illegal Guns coalition. Mark Begich -- mayor of Anchorage -- claimed that he'd been misled by the group when it was convenient to disown them upon running for higher office (his senate seat). The Mayor of Kodiak, Carolyn Floyd, is no longer the mayor. Pat Branson has replaced her, and Ms. Branson does not show up on the MAIG roster. Alaska is now 100% MAIG free! This should be good for our crime rate, as members of MAIG are known to commit crimes at an above-average rate. Now, if only we could get that Brady Score of zero down to at least -2...

Want to make some money?

Head on down to St Louis and open carry.  The mayor and police department are poised to undertake all sorts of pretty much unlawful acts:

Police will also perform I.D. checks on street corners and conduct gun searches, and Parks says he won’t hesitate to call in the National Guard if the spike in violence continues.
“Vehicles that are moving will be stopped and searched for guns, weapons, drugs, and open alcohol and any other violations that are taking place,” Parks later told KMOX’s Mark Reardon. “People who are walking, people who are bicycling, can be stopped and searched for the same and, when it comes to state IDs, we’re going to be confirming that state IDs are in place for everyone involved.”

While Missouri lacks pre-emption for open carry issues, it appears that St Louis does not have any sort of ordnance forbidding the practice.  Assuming the police don't execute you in cold blood the name of officer safety, I'd imagine that under the Mayor's declaration of essentially martial law (how else can you interpret roving checkpoints and warrantless searches/seizures of broad swathes of the population without probable cause involving threats to involve the national guard?) you would probably be hassled for open carrying...  and handily win a nice civil rights lawsuit.

I understand that the Mayor wants to crack down on gang violence.  You can't just piss all over people's Constitutional rights for doing so, though.  THe police need reasonable articulable suspicion to do a Terry Frisk for weapons.  They can't just set up checkpoints and shake everyone down.

Guess what:  maybe part of the problem is that half the kids are below the poverty line, 90% of them fail to meet reading/math standards, and a quarter don't graduate high school (which pretty much requires "just showing up," as disgusted residents refer to the school system as "day care").  Interestingly, the mayor of East St Louis is not a member of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, which I guess is good as it means he is less likely to be a felon.  Neighboring regular St Louis' mayor is a member.

Oh, and by the way -- East St Louis wins the prize for highest murder rate in the US.  On second thought, tou might want to consider open carrying an AR with body armor...

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Somali Piracy

From the AP:

Armed guards aboard cargo ships and an international naval armada that carries out onshore raids have put a huge dent in piracy and might even be ending the scourge... 

No vessel with armed guards has ever been hijacked, noted Cyrus Moody of the International Maritime Bureau. A June report from the U.N. Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea said armed guards have forced pirates to “abort attacks earlier and at greater ranges from targeted vessels.”

Go figure.  Personal weapons -- likely rifles -- wielded by private merchants are apparently 100% effective in preventing piracy by organized groups with heavy weapons in a lawless corner of the world.  Even the UN admits this.  It almost makes one wonder why the UN wants to severely restrict firearms possessed by non-state actors.

Also, think of the cost/benefit.  How much taxpayer money does it cost to put an armada of naval and air assets in the Gulf of Aden?  How much does a four man security team with ARs or FALs and a water cannon cost?

Monday, September 24, 2012

Pigeons and Pups



We got a few pigeons this weekend to do some yard work with Kodi.  At this point, all I want is for her to get excited about the birds and realize that she can't catch them herself, so that she'll start pointing.  To that end, the plan was to sneak them into the yard, dizzy them, and then let her out to do her thing.  So we dizzied two birds, planting them on opposite sides of the yard.  She comes out and within moments has scented the first and flushed it.

It flushes all of two feet.  So she catches it.  Bad pigeon.  We take that one away and she catches the scent of the second.  This one flushes properly and Kodi spends the next half hour racing madly around the yard, all worked up.  Pigeon number one has been returned to the box in hopes that it can be used later.

Day two, I take one pigeon out.  As I'm checking to see if it's the non-flying one from yesterday, it escapes from me in the garage and proves that it can fly quite well by evading both Chris and I for about five minutes.  Chris finally recaptures it and I plant it outside.  Out comes Kodi.  The bird is rather well hidden this time and  it takes her about a minute to zero in on it.  She jumps at it, it flushes...

...and it slams into the fence rather than flying over.  Exasperated by this point, I just toss the pigeon over the fence, not wanting to use it again.  Kodi commences hyperactive running for the next hour or so.  She's very birdy, at least!

Then today, as we're eating dinner, I hear a great big slam into the glass door.  I get up, open the door, and there is the darned pigeon, sitting on the doorstep.

You've got to be kidding me.

Chris tried to catch it, but it flushed and flew on off over the fence.

Hopefully we don't get any other pigeons that stupid.

Type 53s

Well, lookie what the UPS man dropped off today:




That's two Type 53 ChiCom knockoffs of the venerable Russki M44 Mosin Nagants.  My hex mosin 91/30 shoots well enough but it is really unwieldy.  So I figured I'd try the carbine version out.

I got two because for  for $120 + S&H, let's face it, why not?  If you're going to pay $35 of shipping why not get two?  I figure I will either (A) combine all the best parts into one then sell/trade the other one to enhance my collection or (B) clean them both up and turn them into wall hangers, truck guns, or something like that.  I may even sporterize one.  At the rate that Mosin prices have been moving I feel pretty sure about getting my initial cost out fairly easily.

Initial impressions:

These rifles have been rode hard and put away wet.  The furniture is badly worn; one stock has some rough engravings and the other foregrip is actually grapped through.  The wood is not nearly as nice as my Russian 91/30; it is soft and badly scratched.  The bores are dark with relatively faint rifling.  Upon disassembly I found the bolts to be filthy and the other parts to be a mix of dirty grease and a bit of cosmoline.

This is a big difference from my 91/30.  Despite being a few decades older, the 91/30 looks like it spent most of its existence in a Russian warehouse packed in cosmoline.  My Type 53s date to the 1950s and look like they were used by Charlie to shoot a bunch of Yanquis in the 'nam.  They're ROUGH.  On the plus side -- no rust or rot!

These rifles did not come with the "accessories kit:"  sling, oiler, ammo pouch, etc that came with the 91/30s from AIM.  I figure I'll shoot them, see if they're decent, and if I'm keeping them may pick up some cheap slings.

Right now I've got them entirely broken down.  Anything made out of metal is soaking in CLP.  I figure I'll revisit them in mid week, wipe them down, and reapply CLP for another 48 hours before doing a more thorough cleaning.  They're so filthy right now that they just need to be soaked for a bit to loosen the gunk.

That C&R FFL is dangerous...  to my credit card!

Teaching and RSOing


Friday evening I taught my first ever course all by myself.  It wasn't a firing course or anything, but still, something to feel good about.

In a nutshell, the student went from "I don't really feel comfortable that my husband bought this shotgun" to "We should probably buy a handgun in the next few months and hey, would you teach this class to a bunch of my friends?" I think that goes in the win column!  I also think I can get her out to the range in a few months (she's pregnant at the moment).

I definitely could have spent more time practicing before the lesson, but I had a rough week and ended up relying on my educational background a little more than I should have.  Nothing went wrong, but if I'd spent a bit more time practicing I just could have done some things that much better.

Saturday I spent 4 hours doing my RSO "training" for the local range.  I used quotation marks because the gentleman "training" me knows how qualified I am (seeing as he wants me to teach courses with him) and basically started the line in the morning and handed the reins over to me entirely after two minutes.  The day went pretty well, I think.  My commands were audible to just about everyone except the deaf guy on the end, something I'd been concerned about given the length of the line.  I had two instances of gun handling while the range was cold that I jumped on instantly and one attempt to go downrange before I had cleared the line which I also took care of swiftly.  I almost had to call an emergency cease-fire, but fortunately Chris was able to capture the escaped dog before it crossed the firing line - and why did someone bring their dog in the first place?  Anyway, it was overall a positive experience.  I even got a marriage proposal and found out that I am known among some of the other RSOs as "the girl with the 30.06."  In Alaska, that wouldn't be worth a comment but apparently it is down here!

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Ability, Opportunity, Jeopardy

I can't wait to see Mas Ayoob's justification for this incident.

I suspect that if I shot a man in a wheelchair who happened to be missing an arm and a leg who was waving a pen at me I'd be on trial for Murder 2, but hey, qualified immunity for the win, right?

Range Day

I went down to the range today.

AR

I ran about 60 rounds through the AR over the course of 2 hours or so.

First up I zeroed the AR.  I just installed new backup iron sights and moved my Aimpoint so things were a bit out of whack.  I dialed in the irons with just 8 rounds (checking both apertures) and managed the Aimpoint in 6.  Nice.  I did so from the bench which was the only bench shooting all day.  I used the Aimpoint all day.

I started with what I'm calling the "AQT Redcoats Drill:"  This uses the Appleseed "Red Coats" target.  It features British-themed silhouettes at simulated 100/200/300/400 yards plus a 250 yard fence post (or head shot depending on which version of the tale).  I invented a drill with it on the fly today:
  • 100 yards:  2 shots + emergency reload + 1 shot.  Standing.  30 seconds.
  • 200 yards:  2 shots + emergency reload + 1 shot.  Transition from standing to sitting.  30 seconds.
  • 300 yards:  2 shots + emergency reload + 1 shot.  Transition from standing to prone.  30 seconds.
  • 400 yards:  2 shots + emergency reload + 1 shot, plus one on the "head shot" for a total of four.  Start in prone position.  60 seconds.

    The time limits are pretty generous.  On the Appleseed AQT you get 50 seconds for 2+8 into two targets at 200 yards, for example.  You get 60 seconds for 2+8 into three targets at 300 yards.  Still, 30 seconds is a reasonable goal and if you can shoot in rifleman's cadence then getting the 7 additional shots off in 20 more seconds is quite reasonable (1 shot/3 secs). 
I got a lot out of this drill.  You get plenty of practice with mag changes and can ID issues;  for example I found that my first two shots were good and my third was crud, so I targeted that with some 1+1 drills later. You can get groups and diagnose issues.  You can test NPOA.  You have to shift (stage 4/slow fire).  You transition to the different shooting positions.  You can confirm a zero.  I learned a lot that focused my practice and only spent 13 rounds to do so.

I'm not thrilled with how I did.  I cleared the 100 and 200.  I got 2/3 on the 300 (the third was low, probably the reload).  All of my 400 yd shots and the headshot were off; I had zeroed the red dot for center mass and I shot the drill with a "six o'clock hold."  I called them good, and the group was decent (about 5 MOA with some lateral dispersion), but it was low.  Oops.

Next I did a bunch of standing to sitting/prone transitions with 1 + reload + 1.  I got a lot of practice out of just two shots and really dialed in the mag changes.  Did some dry fire.  My last two groups with each technique (sitting/prone) were about 2.5 MOA.  Sweet.

Finally I wrapped up with some paper plates, off hand, 25 yards.  Just did some double taps with a reload and either another double tap or after actions.  I was getting tired and it was just a lot of fun.

All in all for $20 of ammo I felt like I got a lot of practice.

As a side note, a Vietnam vet next to me was shooting a bolt gun from the bench.  He wandered over and opined that he has an M4 and "it ain't good for nuttin out past 50 or maybe 100 yards."  I showed him my target with 4 MOA pairs from field positions and he just scratched his head.  He did agree that the AR-15 platform has been greatly improved since the initial fielding...  He did share a good 'nam story about getting getting reamed out by a REMF Colonel for carrying a personal sidearm (a 6" colt python revolver).  THe colonel apparently asked, "Soldier, you're not allowed to carry a personal weapon on government business!"  The guy said he replied, "Well sir, I reckon once Charlie's close enough that I need this then its pretty damn personal business."  Definitely worth a chuckle.  

NEW SHOTGUN SHOOTER

One of my coworkers picked up a shotgun (a savage 12 gauge) pawn shop special for home defense.  He wanted some help shooting and patterning it.  We started with basic stance; I haven't ever taken a shotgun class but figured that an aggressive carbine stance would work well enough and was better than nothing so that's what we went with.  We then went through loading/unloading.  He was short stroking the action leading to constant stoppages for awhile but we straightened that out, first dry then live.

Finally, we patterned.  At about 15 yards 12 gauge buck with reduced recoil was making a softball or cantaloupe sized pattern.  He was pretty surprised as the guy in the pawn shop said something like, "Oh yeah, don't have to aim, just spray down the hallway and the bad guy will be hit."  Umm, no.  At hallway distances and closer you definitely need to aim with a shotgun.

The first group patterned a bit high and left.  Follow on groups were even higher, off of an IDPA silhouette.  I put two or three rounds through and was center mass on my aim point.  I watched him and it looked like he was flinching, with eyes closed, trigger jerking, etc.  We then did dry fire and wrapped it up.

This is probably worth a post in itself but I came away convinced that a 12 gauge pump shotgun is not what many people imagine it to be.

HANDGUN

I wrapped up with a box or two through the Beretta.  Started with a 5+5 ragged hole drill.  Then did a bunch of malfunctions with mags mixed with live rounds, brass, and dummy rounds, as well as a bunch of reloads.  Wrapped up with 5+5 ragged hole which was good; I started to get lazy and was point shooting and/or missing the front sight so the accuracy drill really tightened things up again.

All in all a productive four hours or so.  I was busy but got a lot done without a lot of ammo.  My new shooting jacket was the awesome, and probably merits its own post.

Friday, September 21, 2012

Winning

In the sporting goods section of a local department store we have a firearms counter.  I was picking up some household items and idly swung by the long guns rack.  In addition to the usual hunting rifles and shotguns they had a few black rifles...  Not just a DPMS, either.  They had a Noveske Hunter, a S&W M&P (upper end of the line, and a Stag in 6.8.  Not bad.

Also, I was working on the AR and trying to find somewhere to put it that is dog-proof...  I said, "Ok, I'll just toss it in the bedroom, that's the best place for it anyways."  And Heather's cool with that.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Gun Cleaning Day

I'll admit it -- I'm kind of lazy when it comes to cleaning firearms.  Luckily most of our firearms are really pretty low maintenance.  The bolt and lever guns seem to be happy with the occasional bore snake and a cleaning before and after hunting season.  The 10/22s hum along merrily for hundreds of rounds without complaint.  Heck, with the upgraded extractors I put in there I suspect that they'll be good for over a thousand rounds between cleanings -- that brass really flies and the bolt hums along line a sewing machine.

The S&W M&Ps have been boringly reliable.  We've run four day handgun classes with them without any cleaning and been just fine.  I cleaned them today for the first time in, well, probably 4-6 months.  They probably have close to a thousand rounds through them, if not more, and they were working just fine.  I cleaned them only because I had all the stuff out and they go pretty quick once you strip 'em all.

My Beretta 96 was actually showing some signs of fouling.  I was getting some weak extraction; not quite enough to cause a malf but the slide cycling was definitely noticeably slower or different.  The slide release was getting "mushy" results in that the slide would go forward haltingly.  Sure enough I stripped it down and it was pretty dirty, but the Beretta is trivially easy to strip and clean.  One of the handgrip screws was showing a tiny spot of rust but that came right off.

Finally, I went through the AR as well.  Everyone tells me that the AR needs to be coddled like a spoiled princess, that it shits where it eats, etc.  Well, this one has been fired regularly with probably 6+ months since the last cleaning, over a thousand rounds including an Appleseed through it, and it lives under my bed with the dust bunnies.  Our range has fine brown sand on the line and that also got into everything.  I hadn't noticed any malfs or issues but felt a bit guilty so I figured I'd clean it.  Sure enough, the AR was NASTY.    I could see the carbon build up in the barrel, the firing pin was black, my fingers were caked in gunk.  The carbon, dust bunnies, and brown dust had mixed into a nasty sort of cake-like substance.  So, I stripped it down, liberally applied CLP, went back to the handguns, and then in an hour or so returned.  The carbon came off nicely, I dried off most of the oil, and we're good to go.

The AR platform has been very reliable for me.  Sure, I see the advantages of a piston driven design.  However, the ol' boring gas impingement system is not that awful to take care of.  It isn't like you need to detail strip the thing every few magazines or after every trip to the range.  And again, I had experienced ZERO malfs or other troubling symptoms.  So the filthy AR was probably good for another few hundred rounds.

Getting My Instructing On

After a hectic week at work preceded by an awesome, but exhausting (to the tune of over 24 hours driving) weekend, I'll be celebrating the end of the workday on Friday by teaching my first Home Firearms Safety class and following that up Saturday morning with RSO training at the local range.  On top of that, we're thinking of going up to North Carolina next weekend for an Appleseed!  After Action Reports to follow - once I get a chance to breathe!

The Death of the First Amendment

Over at the LA Times, a major national newspaper, an op-ed from a publically-subsidized National Public Radio reporter was run advocating criminal charges for the type of speech exhibited in "The Innocence of Muslims."  As a side note, this reporter was also previously a special advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff so she is theoretically knowledgeable about government policy at a fairly high level.  She contributed to US policy in reaction to the Arab Spring.

The reporter claims that the defamatory video is not deserving of Constitutional protection under the First Amendment as it created a "clear and present danger" of violence.

She argues that the speech obviously had a "likelihood" of inciting violence because many Muslims hate America and are subject to awful governments that encourage baiting of "the other" to discourage domestic unrest aimed at the regime "those frustrations are often vented in religious, not political, terms, because religion is a more socially acceptable, and safer, rationale for public outcry."  Of course, she also points out that the signs of "manipulation" of the mobs were apparent, but still, anyone could have known that this obscure video would likely incite violence, right?

She also argues that the speech would incite imminent violence because the reactions typically come within two weeks.

I, obviously, disagree with both points.  First off, regarding "likelihood:"  there are numerous highly offensive jokes, videos, and comics produced on a regular basis.  Only a small percentage of them serve as pretexts for violent action.  So I think it is far from clear that it is more likely than not (i.e. at least a 51% chance) that a given offensive media item will spark violent reactions in foreign countries.

Next, regarding "imminence:"  Since when is TWO WEEKS "imminent?"  In most states, you can use deadly force only against imminent threats.  Does this mean that I can now shoot that shifty looking guy at the 7-11 because he might attack me next month?  Of course not!  Imminent means "near, at hand;" it is obviously related to the word "immediate;" even a look at the plain definition and usage indicates that "imminent" means it is happening right the heck now, not two weeks from now.

Finally, when the violent reaction is calculated, threatened, and pre-meditated, I don't necessarily think that legitimate free speech is the problem.  For example, let's take a hypothetical scenario or two:

A Neo-Nazi group threatens to blow up a Jewish-run deli in the tristate NYC/NJ/Philly area for every article written in the NYT by any reporter of Jewish descent.  To demonstrate their seriousness, they blow up a pipe bomb in a public park.  Does the freedom of the press afforded the NYT by the 1A protect their Jewish reporters even if their speech will result in an imminent and likely violent response?  Should the NYT Editorial Board be prosecuted or subjected to civil sanctions for their grossly negligent speech?

A Christian Identity group threatens to shoot up the Southern Poverty Law Center and other political/media targets if the SPLC releases a report "unfairly slandering" their organization as a "hate group."  They mail spent bullet casings to the SPLC anonymously to prove their capability.  If the SPLC releases a report identifying the group as a hate group, is their speech and freedom of association protected despite the imminent and likely violent response?  Should SPLC be prosecuted for their reckless speech?

A eco-terrorist front threatens to attack logging companies and oil rig workers if a pro-drilling editorial is allowed to be published in the WSJ by a candidate for major political office.  Law enforcement deems the threats to be credible.  If the candidate pens the op-ed and it is published, is it protected speech despite the imminent and likely violent eco-terrorism?  Should the politician be subject to criminal penalties for their reckless speech?

The road that the LA Times and their op-ed page wants to go down is a dangerous one indeed for the First Amendment.  The fact that so many Americans concur is troubling indeed.  The video was offensive and stupid but was almost certainly protected speech.

The only question I have is whether the speaker was protected.  Given that he was on probation, the speaker may have lost significant rights.  But looking at the content of the movie alone, it clearly seems to be conduct that should be protected by the 1A.

Monday, September 17, 2012

Open Carry Roadtrip

Over the weekend we took a little road trip and I took advantage of the opportunity to open carry in a beautiful holster from Dragon Leatherworks.  On long road trips, OWB is much more comfortable than IWB and I like carrying a full size handgun rather than a tiny little holdout pistol.

I did have a few run-ins of interest.

In a fairly crowded Sheetz, I ducked into the rest room after tanking up.  A Virginia State Police officer came in a few seconds behind me.  He ducked into the stall and we both went about our business.  As we were washing up, he noticed I was OC'ing, looked at me, made eye contact, and said, "Hey" in a polite tone of voice.  I replied, "Good morning!"  He shrugged, said, "Nice holster," went back to washing his hands, and we moved on with our lives.  I said "Thanks."  No big deal.  I'd rack this up as a "positive" encounter.  VCDL has done some good work in VA!

The guy behind me in line at the Sheetz also noticed but said nothing, especially once he saw the LEO not caring.  Again, no big deal.

In another gas station I was waiting on line for the bathroom with a priest and an old guy ("So, an open carrier, an AARP member, and a priest walk into a bar...").  It was a single-holer so I was waiting awhile.  A workman who was fixing the coke machine eventually wandered over.

He asked, "What's that behind you?"  I replied, "I think its the new gatorade."  He then said, "No, your gun."

I then said, "Oh, its a Smith and Wesson M&P in a holster from Dragon Leatherworks."  He said, "Cool!  I've got a 380 right here."  He then tapped his front pocket, smiling (genuinely, not in a creepy or "make my day" kind of way).  I replied, "Oh, cool!  My wife carries one of those when her M&P is too much!"  I meant to be rapport-building and excited about his choice of firearm but I think I punctured his ego a bit as he deflated some.  I did mention OCDO though.  Overall a positive to neutral encounter that I kind of bungled.

It continually amazes me how few people even notice you are OC'ing.  I was wearing a white tshirt and a nice FlatJack holster with a big colorful design on it and most people just did not notice, so it wasn't like I was wearing a dark polo with black holster.  The people who do notice tend to be carrying themselves and it is just not a big deal for anyone.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Why I stopped commenting at Common Gunsense... Again

For those who don't know, Common Gunsense is a blog run by a board member of the Brady Campaign, Joan Peterson.  She happens to be bat shit crazy, but she IS a gift that keeps on giving.

I heard a little birdy tell me that she was slamming Alaska so I trolled over to check out the posts.  Sure enough she was claiming that decreased training for CCW = increased gun deaths.  See Alaska has the highest gun deaths in the country and they have so called "Constitutional Carry."  Oh noes!  Case closed!

Of course, reasoned discourse broke out after my first comment or two.  Her reply:

Dear Chris,As you can see, several of your comments were published by me. Some were not. Your paranoia is showing. I don't publish comments that attack me and lecture me. Have a nice day.

My first comment was long, near the word count limit.  It got Reasoned Discoursed so I provided a shorter bullet format summary using smaller words because I suspect she has some sort of learning disability.  Sadly, I rebooted my computer with the notepad file so I lost the original.  I suppose Joan could do me the favor of posting it but the cognitive dissonance would probably make her cranium explode.

The key points were as follows:

  • At most, "better safety training for people carrying guns in public" would have affected 2.5% (or 3 out of 120) of 2007 Alaska gun deaths, and likely many fewer.  80% of the "gun deaths" in Alaska in 2007 were suicides (CDC WISQARS data).  17.5% of them were homicides (FBI data), the majority of which were almost certainly committed by prohibited persons who could not touch a firearm legally (my own analysis and ADN reporting).  The remaining 2.5% were either unknown causes, cops shooting perps, civilians lawfully defending themselves (justifiable homicides), or accidents.  Resources are limited and attention focused on one thing so if we want to really bring down "gun deaths" why not reduce suicides by looking at mental health service access, substance abuse in rural areas, endemic domestic violence, and other proven interventions?
  • Training is expensive.  It also takes time.  If it is going to be mandatory then the "common sense" compromise is for the training to be subsidized via a refundable tax credit, along with allowances for child care, as well as making training available on nights and weekends.  Such a scheme is argueably quite constitutional (likely as a federal-state program) under the powers defined in Article I/Section 8 of the Constitution.  After all, if training is effective in reducing accidents then it should be available to as many people as possible, right?
  • Efforts to deny suffrage to minority groups through "poll taxes" and "literacy tests" were evil.  Even Joan describes voter ID laws as "voter suppression efforts" and seems to dislike them.  I suspect that charging people a fee to worship in a particular type of place (imagine NYC charging a "Jihadist Monitoring Fee" to people going to mosques?), requiring expensive training to order books on Amazon or right a letter to the editor, or getting an expensive permit before being able to assert fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination would be deemed unacceptable suppression of civil rights.  Why is it ok to suppress the exercise of the 2A based on income?

    I guess the straw that pushed her over the edge was my comment that "in my vision of America, a poor working single mom with three kids in the inner city has just as much an ability to exercise her rights as a wealthy doctor in the 'burbs.  We shouldn't parcel out rights in this country based on income or zip code."  For those who don't know, Joan has described her husband as a doctor and I suspect that she lives in a comfortable wonderbread suburban lifestyle -- oh, yeah, and she's a gunowner (I still don't understand how she can keep guns in the home and simultaneously believe that having guns in the home increases her risk of death at the hands of a family member 43 times or whatever the nonsense is these days).  So I guess it hits close to home when you point out the "rights for me, but not for the poor 'urban' people" inconsistency in her mindset.

Apparently those points are "paranoid."  That's right, the entire fricking civil rights movement was apparently paranoid because they saw poll taxes and literacy tests as having the result of suppressing exercise of a right.  Joan has made it clear that she has a very different vision of America, one where the privileged elite who make "enough" money, went to the "right" schools, and have the "right" kind of friends/connections have rights and the "urban" proletariat just don't.  How "progressive."

Joan is absolutely right about one thing though.  People need to stop lecturing her.  I stopped for a long time and this latest incident reminds me why.  People like Joan Peterson shouldn't be lectured, because lecturing implies some sort of teaching/learning process is occurring   People like Joan are bigots who want to systematically strip civil rights from the poor and powerless.  It is fairly disturbing to believe that people in general should worship/vote/assemble/speak their minds/keep arms/refuse to quarter soldiers/etc less.  It moves into evil territory when the people in society who are relatively weak and powerless are specifically targeted to have their rights stripped first.

She is simply pursuing an agenda best defined as "troubling" in a manner which is best described as "opportunistically evil."  Cognitive dissonance does not bother her.  She cannot be appeased with compromise.

Joe Huffman is right:  driving the anti-rights bigots to political extinction and irrelevancy is the only way to proceed.

UPDATE:  She actually posted one of the shorter rebuttals and claimed to not understand the issue.  She also wrote...
"Migo- explain to me how self defense is an inalienable right. "
This nonsense about requiring training disenfranchising the poor is ridiculous and specious. If you want to eliminate training using that as an excuse, you are using a very poor and dangerous argument. If poor people can afford guns, they can afford the training."


So, basically -- "BAH!  Let them eat cake!"  It must be easy to say, "oh, if you can afford a gun you can afford to pay over a grand for the permit process (Cali, NYC, DC, for example) from the point of view of a priveleged housewife married to a wealthy professional living in a nice suburb.  THe view probably looks a little different from the other side of the poverty line.

QE3?

I bought a bunch of silver the high teens a few years back then sold about half in the high $30s during the last rally.  I then bought a bunch more when it dipped into the low $20s recently and I hope you did too, because the Fed has ramped up the presses.

AR vs. AK Debate and Price Points

One of the longest running debates on the internet is the AR vs. AK drama.  It seems like this question is one which can never be resolved.

One of the big selling points in the past for the AK, other than its legendary reliability, was its price point.  Used to be you could pick up a beater entry level AK for around $300-400, and an entry level AR was twice that or more.

It seems like that is no longer the case.  Looking at auctions about to close on GunBroker, the cheapest AK models come in at $600.  The "sale" price at PSA is $600 too.

Meanwhile, I can price out a pretty darn good AR for right around there:

Heck if you don't want to assemble it all yourself, you can just get a pre-built lower and slap the upper on it (saving some Pittman-Roberts taxes), or even Wally World is selling entry-level DPMS for around six bills.

It seems that AK supplies are drying up (or demand is rapidly escalating), and meanwhile, as ARs explode in popularity the prices are coming way down, way quick (except for receivers).

I've got a nice BCM 14.5" middy under the bed and an $300 WASR-10 sitting in the safe upstairs.  I've shot both platforms.  The AK definitely has a few things that appeal to me:  I like the gas piston design (easy to clean/run), I like the round (7.62x39 with the right bullet is at least appropriate for white-tail deer if you want to go hunting, and com block ammo is DIRT CHEAP), the ergonomics tend to be ok for me (I shoot rifles lefty so the bolt and safety are actually just right!), and the option for a folding stock is nice.  A lot of folks knock the ~4 MOA accuracy out of AKs; given that the round is really only designed for 200 yard shooting anways and most (A) white tail deer hunting and (B) defensive civilian encounters occur within 100 yards that doesn't concern me a whole lot.  I would not feel terribly undergunned with an AK for a defensive carbine.

However, the AR is definitely a superior defensive firearm for me in many ways; the biggest killer on the AK for me is the marginal sight setup (the stock irons are not great and have short sight radius) and the slow two handed mag changes.  The light recoil on the AR is a plus too.

If the AK was still half the price of an AR, I could see it being a compelling choice for a lot of folks.  Comparing a $300 WASR-10 to a $600+ AR is actually kind of a difficult choice.  But a cruddy century WASR-10 at a $600 price point or an Arsenal Top-Shelf AK for $1000 is pretty hard to compare to a M4Gery for the same price.

Anti Rights Cultists on the First

I tend to think that framing the infringements on the 2A in terms of infrigements on the rest of the bill of rights is pretty effective:  after all, I'd like to think that most people would find it unacceptable to impose mandatory training to preach a sermon, licensing for all Jews/Muslims/Baptists/Mormons/Catholics/whatever, or registration for all Bible/Koran/Torah/whatever sales.

On NPR today, a "journalist" from Newsweek (their Paris and Middle Eastern Affairs correspondent, Christopher Dickey) was making the argument that in light of the recent fracas in the Middle East, Americans need to exercise "responsible speech," not "free speech."  He pointed out that the founders could never have imagined the technological amplifiers that allow a single individual to magnify their opinion around the world (i.e. YouTube or Twitter).  He argued that the SCOTUS has ruled that you cannot cry "fire in a crowded theater" and that based on this technology, the whole world is a theater, and it is one full of people who are easily frightened/offended.

The journalist then stated, "oh, well, I'm a journalist so of course I believe in free speech very strongly, but it needs to be responsible speech" in response to a caller who tried to savage his anti-rights position.

See any parallels to 2A issues?

Let me illuminate what "responsible speech" would entail.

  • Special licensing and registration to possess any high-audience communications means.  This includes any technology beyond what was possessed in the 18th century during the framing of the constitution, included electricity powered presses, internet-enabled technologies, and so on.  It should also include any technologies not "in common use" (whatever that means) such as new and emerging social networking technologies and such.
  • Registration for each item of "free speech" (letter to the editor, book, pamphlet, newspaper article, YouTube video, etc).  No anonymous communication permitted.  After all, "responsible speech" entails consequences and we need to be able to trace these items back to their original authors.
  • Licensing for speakers.  If someone is going to engage in "responsible speech" then they need training and background checks prior to engaging in their public affairs activities.  After all, someone who buys a laptop and webcam can certainly afford a reasonable training regimen, right?  People need to be educated on sensitivity related topics to avoid offending certain audiences and also need to be aware of the penalties for irresponsible speech.
I imagine that you can brainstorm lots of other measures that would be necessary to ensure "responsible speech."

Let's also ask "Cui Bono?"  Who benefits from "responsible speech?"  Dead tree publications, that's who.  Newseek is in financial free fall.  It was sold for ONE DOLLAR a few years ago.  But if only "licensed journalists" with sufficient sensitivity training were permitted to engage in "responsible speech" then they might turn that sinking ship around, eh?

The anti-rights cultists on the far left and far right will not stop at shredding the 2A.  The first, fourth, and all the others will be used for toilet paper if these sorts of people have their way.  They need to be forced to articulate the logical outcome of their asinine proposals in specific ways and then have their bleatings ridiculed in a public forum.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

NVDs

Ryan over at TSLRF recently picked up a set of top-shelf 14's (gen 3 NVD).

I'm really interested in some NVDs as well, but I'm not willing to spend a lot of dough.  I'm hoping the Pareto principle helps me out.  My goals are pretty limited:  be able to do some land nav in the dark, check out the back yard, navigate to a tree stand, that sort of stuff.  I don't need to snipe coyotes or hogs at 200 yards on a ranch in Texas.  I've used Gen 3 NVDs, they're awesome, but they're also way too expensive.  Everything I want to do is inside of 25 meters or so and can be done in conjunction with an IR illuminator.

At the lower end of the price range you're limited to gen 1 type stuff.  This is Vietnam era tech.  It works with lots of ambient light (moon, visible lights, etc) or strong IR illumination.  It is obviously rather limited, but I think for my budget and goals it will probably work.

There seem to be a few options in the Gen 1 price-space:

  • Old Russian Kit.  A few years back a bunch of stuff was imported.  The problem is parts availability to keep it working.
  • Cheap digital devices.  The Night Owl XGEN is an example, coming in at just over a hundred bucks.  These look to be fairly marginal, but if the price was right (sale?) then might be a useful gadget.  I like that they won't be damaged to visible light and the lifespan is theoretically longer.  I think in a couple of years the digital tech will be the place to go.  It seems to be improving pretty steadily and rapidly.  Right now, thought, it just doesn't quite seem to be there.
  • Cheap Gen 1 devices.  Yukon seems to be the best rated.  I've looked at their NVMT which comes in at under three bills and it looks like it might be decent for my needs.  My Aimpoint PRO is NVD compatible so they might work together.  Yukon has a good warranty which is a plus.
  • I'm also kind of interested in the Bushnell Equinox.  THe integral rail seems like a nice touch with a lot of options.
  • Weapon scopes.  Yukon makes a NVMT weapon scope as well that comes in under $400.  The problem with this is that anything you look at, you're pointing a rifle at.  I don't like that one bit.
  • AN/PVS-2.  This is the mil-spec gen 1 NVD.  It is better than most other gen 1s as it has multiple stages.  It is also milspec which means more durability.  The downside is that it weighs like 6 lbs.  They also run around $600+.
Right now I am thinking of holding out until Black Friday or Xmas to see if anything comes up on sale.  Right now I'm leaning towards a Yukon NVMT.  I think for around $250 I'll get a lot of capability exceeding that of the $120 Night Owl optic.  I'm also keeping my eyes open on Ebay for a deal.

Got Peppers?


As I've mentioned before, this summer's garden has put forth a bounty of cayenne peppers.  I've got 10 feet of strung dried peppers, gave away three feet, and I still have two full dehydrator trays waiting to be strung.  I needed a use for all those peppers (or at least some of them!).

Clearly, the answer is to use them to infuse tequila.

This is a beautiful thing.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Mossberg MVP

One of the more interesting offerings from Mossberg recently is the MVP.  It is basically a bolt action in 5.56 (not .223) that takes AR mags.  Interesting and initially really intriguing.

Then I started thinking about it.  I can't imagine a purpose for the rifle.

If I want a cheaper varminting tack driver I'll just get a Savage.  Even their Axis will likely deliver better accuracy at a lower price. The only downside of the Savage is that it uses a proprietary polymer mag (may be better if it reduces feeding issues) and is chambered in .223, not the somewhat beefed up 5.56 (although I suspect 5.56 would be just fine in a Savage).

If I want a cheaper semiauto then I'll build an AR for $600 or pick up a used mini-14.

I would be rather interested in a "Cub Scout" MVP:

  • Iron sights (aperture style)
  • Flash hider
  • Accepts STANAG standard magazines
  • 18-20" bbl is probably about right -- 5.56 doesn't do well out of the short barrel
  • Get weight down to 6 lbs or less.  It is currently at 7.  That is zero weight savings over an AR.  With the light recoil of the 5.56/.223, there is no reason why the weight shouldn't be gotten as light as possible.
  • Practical parkerized or stainless finish
  • Keep the laminate stock, or consider going quality polymer
  • Forward mounted scope rail for scout scope option
I'm not 100% committed to the scout scope.  I think a "cub scout" could be a nice, quick handling rifle capable of varminting out to 200-300 yards.  However, a conventional scope setup also makes a fair amount of sense for this particular caliber.  Overall I think the scout scope option makes a bit more sense; it would differentiate the MVP in the marketplace from very similar options and seems to make sense with some of the other features (feeding from STANAG mags, 5.56 rather than .223 chamber, etc).

I'm going to sit tight and see how this rifle shakes out.  Hopefully they add a "cub scout" version to the lineup with the above features.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Weekend of Stuff Breaking

Had two equipment problems this weekend.

First, I went to fire up ye olde lawnmower to tackle some serious grass that was about three days overdue for a cutting.  The lawn mower is an "Alaska special," a no-name off the bargain rack, perfectly suitable for mowing slow-growing grass in the frozen northlands once or twice a year but not really suited to conditions in our current more fecund locale.  I fired it up and it puttered slowly to life, put out a ton of smoke, and then puttered back to sleep.  We did an emergency run to the hardware store and swapped out the oil to no avail.

After gnashing of teeth I finally decided to get a new mower.  I wasn't willing to invest serious time or money into a $99 mower that had given years of service already.  So we ended up with a Husquervna Self Propelled Wonder 3000.  It was a floor model so they cut us a discount.  On the plus side it does cut through the tall grass like a beast.

Next, I turned on my Kindle.  The bottom half of the screen is locked with an image.  None of the self-help options work.  The warranty just expired.  All Amazon can do is ship me a new one for a paltry 20% off.  So much for standing behind your product.  I have enough digital content on the Kindle that I'll probably grit my teeth and buy one but I'm not thrilled about it.

Kind of an expensive weekend.

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Training vs. Gun Deaths

I'm a big fan of training for most things. Want to ride a motorcycle?  Not a bad idea to get some instruction first.  Want to skydive?  Might be smart to get instruction before jumping out first.  The funny thing is that firearms training for CWP permit holders does not seem to directly affect the rates of deaths or injuries.   Of course, Joan and the Brady Campaign think it does.  Joan has basically asserted, "More training = fewer gun deaths."  John Lott's research shows that "more training = fewer permits idssued = more crime."

I did a quick look at the stats provided by Joan to assess the validity of her hypothesis that "more training = less gun death."



This chart shows hours of training required to get a CWP on the X axis vs. rate of firearms deaths on the Y axis.

Data Sources:

  • Hours of Training.   John R. Lott Jr.. More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Third Edition (Kindle Location 955). Kindle Edition. Lott did not include data for several states.  I thus surrogated as follows:  CA (4 hrs = minimum for renewal), IA (8 hrs = NRA basic pistol qualifies), KS (8 hrs = training req'ts unclear, I assume NRA basic pistol qualifies), NEBRASKA (8 hrs = NRA basic pistol qualifies).  Illinois and Wisconsin are excluded as they were "no issue" at time of data.  Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island are marked as "24 hours" as they are discretionary "may issue."  Who knows what training is necessary if you haven't donated enough to the local police ball fundraiser?
  • Death Rate:  This is the "Death Rate" as calculated by VPC based on WISQARS data from the CDC 2008 based on a citation from Joan Peterson, Brady Campaign Board Member.  I'm sure that it includes suicides, LEOs and civilians committing justifiable homicides, murders, accidents, etc.

Visually looking at the data there is a very small negative correlation:  i.e. as training requirements for CWPs increase, the rate of firearms deaths appears to decrease.  Sadly, I have Excel Starter right now and it does not appear to be able to do a linear regression.  Still, looking at the correlation, it appears very weak.  This makes sense:  CWP holders are a small percentage of the population.  Why would increasing the training burden on a small fraction of individuals impact the leading cause of gun deaths, i.e. suicide?  How does decreasing the training requirement to carry a concealed handgun in Alaska to zero (Constitutional Carry) result in more people in remote native villages eating a shotgun?

I suspect that there is some sort of lurking variable here.  For example, it is rather plausible that the states with high training requirements (or straight up may issue or no issue) have low rates of firearms ownership which leads to lower rates of firearms death.  This may not correlate with lower rates of criminal activity or homicide or suicide, and indeed, probably does not.  It just means that in anti-gun Illinois suicidal people are more likely to hang themselves than to eat buckshot.

So while I fail to reject the Brady hypothesis based on this quick data analysis, I suspect the Brady hypothesis would fall apart under a bit more scrutiny.  This weak analysis shows, at best, a very weak correlation (which has no bearing on causation, of course).

UPDATE:  I'm not suggesting that this is an appropriate metric to use, either.  Imagine if you compared "Hours of training required to obtain a commercial driver's license for a tank truck" to "all fatalities involving automobiles."  I would expect the former to have only a small correlation, at best, to the latter.  I'm just using statistics provided by the Brady Campaign to show that even in the most favorable interpretation they don't really support the Brady position.

Making It Big!

Dragon Leatherworks is in the TN news!

And you might notice the very pretty holster featured in the video looks very much like the one sitting on Chris' hip at the moment!  Thanks to Linoge for keeping us non-Tennesseeans (is that a word?) in the loop!

Bump in the Night Belts

I had some discussions with coworkers this week about "bump in the night" setups.  One of them remarked that while he and his fiance had handguns in their nightstands they had no way to carry lights, phones, or mags.  My solution to that was initially a set of 5.11 pants that were "fully loaded" with gear in all the pockets; pull 'em on and I was good to go.

My newest solution is a pistol belt loaded up with the essentials.

BELT #1:  Field Gear





This was the first attempt.  I had a bunch of ALICE field gear laying around and put it together.  From left to right:
  • Magazine in M9 pouch ($3)
  • Surefire in M9 pouch ($3)
  • ALICE Compass Pouch with copies of my identification (including my address) so that LEOs can identify me as the resident and space for a cell phone ($1)
  • Canteen.  There's no purpose for this on a home defense belt but I had it on there already and was too lazy to take it off.  I don't know what they cost as I just reused one laying around.
  • Double AR-mag pouch. There are a pair of grenade pockets on there as well integral to the mag pouch, and I plan on putting an Israeli bandage on one side and a CAT on the other.  ($4)
  • Bianchi M12 holster for Beretta ($10).  If you don't have a beretta then you could go MOLLE with a pistol pouch or other solution.
  • ALICE belt ($5)

Total cost for this belt was very reasonable.  All prices include shipping.  I used ebay to accumulate most of the gear.  All in all it cost around twenty five bucks to put together, and actually less as I had some of the gear already.

BELT #2:  CONDOR MOLLE

I decided I wanted a little more flexibility and recently put together a MOLLE kit.


Most of this rig is CONDOR gear.  It isn't top-shelf but it is inexpensive.  This belt is not getting dragged through rough field conditions; it is holding all my junk in one place next to my bed.  I got all the gear from LAPG, and I also got >10% off from the prices below plus free shipping.  From left to right:
  • Double mag pouch with 2xpistol mags ($9).
  • Admin pouch with surefire and identification documents ($10).
  • Dump pouch ($12).
  • SERPA holster for Beretta.  This was a clearance "on sale" deal with the STRIKE attachment platform and ran for a bargain ~$35 or so.  I also have a pistol pouch ($10), which is basically a cruddy holster that my M&P will stuff into.  A Tactical Tailor or other molded rig would be nicer but the $10 version holds over until I drop the coin on something better.
  • Double AR mag pouch ($10).
The belt itself is the Condor tactical battle belt ($15) with a regular old Rigger's Belt ($5) run through it.  The worst thing about this rig is that it won't quickly buckle on; the Rigger's belt is a little more complicated to lace up.

Total cost:  $96.


BELT #3:  5.11 MOLLE





This is Heather's current rig.  It is a mix of 5.11 and no-name gear.  I had most of this stuff laying around so actual cost was lower; I just needed to put it together.  Again, from left to right:
  • Pistol pouch
  • Double AR mag pouch
  • Admin Pouch with ID
  • Cell phone pouch
  • Double pistol mag pouch with mag and light
CHANGES
As previously discussed I'd like to add some basic first aid supplies.  I'm also thinking about adding non-lethals (pepper spray).  The thing is that in the house, I'm concerned about pepper spray affecting me as well.  We have strong castle doctrine and if there is an intruder in the house at night then we are probably well beyond pepper spray on the continuum of force.

Heather has not decided on her long gun of choice yet.  So right now I keep things set up for the AR.  She might later switch to a shotgun rig or something.

ALIBIS

We normally keep ear pro (electronic muffs) attached to the belts as well, as the AR is part of the defensive gameplan.

Moreover both of us are cross dominant shooters.  I shoot pistols with my strong (right) hand and rifles with my weak (left) hand. That's why my belt pouch setup is "weird."  The pistol is on my right (strong pistol) side.    The pistol ammo and light is on my left (weak pistol) side.  The rifle ammo is on my right (weak rifle) side.

VERDICT

The belts have been a very satisfactory solution.  They let me, as a residential defender, very quickly strap on 30 rounds of pistol ammo, 60 rounds of AR ammo, a light source, a phone, and identification so the cops can sort out who is who when they show up.  I have multiple mags which allows for a tactical reload or malfunction clearance.  They strap on over our body armor vests no problem.  They take mere seconds to get strapped on.

At a minimum I suggest readers at home try out an ALICE rig.  You can put one together for around $25 or so.  It gets cheaper if you assemble two or three at a time, as a lot of folks sell multiple pouches in one lot.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Hey, NYC has something in common with Venezuela!

From Fox:

Venezuelan authorites arrested a U.S. ship captain early Thursday after three assault rifles were found on board, the U.S. Embassy said. 
An embassy official said the captain of the Ocean Atlas was being held for an alleged infraction "involving documentation for three rifles carried on board as part of the ship's anti-piracy security package."

Read more: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2012/09/07/us-ship-captain-detained-in-venezuela-after-guns-found-on-ship/#ixzz25pa2A5gG


Of course Venezuela essentially forbids firearms ownership with the exception of what looks like a "may issue" permit system allowing regime cronies to be armed.  In June they instituted a tougher gun control law basically banning private gun ownership.  Previously it looks like they allowed .22 LR rimfires and shotguns.  Given that there are 1.1 million to 2.7 million illegally owned firearms (whatever that means in a country like Venezuela), which could be as much as 100% of the total in civilian hands depending on estimates, and that the defense forces are estimated to only hold around a quarter of a million firearms, I'd say that the law will likely not be adequately enforced.

Of course, a dictator needs to ensure that the people are at least nominally disarmed which explains the crack down of late.

I see at least a few parallels to another major trade city, i.e. New York.  I wonder how many of these freighers quietly pull into and out of NYC every single day without being caught with their anti-piracy packages?  I wonder how long it is until NYC port authority finds an anti-piracy equipment package and brings terrorism charges against Maersk or someone?

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Deal Alert

Palmetto State Armory selling what look to be top-spec AR-15 uppers for $269.

I was really, really tempted by a lightweight cut 16" mid-length.  I have an empty lower in the safe just begging to be turned into something.  I was toying with building a "slick" lightweight iron-sighted AR, maybe even getting a light CavArms style stock for it.

Then I thought about it, and can't really come up with a good niche for it.  Home defense?  I'll use my 14.5" bbl covered in lights with the AimPoint.  Hunting or High Power?  I'll get a 20" bbl with optic.  About the only place a 16" with iron sights would excel might be a carbine class.

So I'm holding off.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Zimmerman news -- judge steps down

I guess either I missed it, or the blogosphere did, but a few days ago the judge in the media-frenzied George Zimmerman case was told to step down by a three-judge panel in Florida.

Yeah, this is the judge that revoked GZ's bail and lambasted him for allegedly being evasive and perverting the justice system.

I wonder if the judge can be sued for libel after the prosecutor finishes dealing with bar complaints for misconduct?  Seriously, for such a high profile case you think the state would have the "A" team on this trial, not the Keystone Cops.

Speaking of Veterans...

As a reminder, Joan Peterson -- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Ownership Board Member -- apparently thinks that military servicemembers should be disarmed off duty.

She brought up the tragic negligent discharge of an Army National Guardsman who was mobilized to support the RNC convention.  He let his buddycheck out his weapon, the buddy had a ND and he was injured badly.  As a side note, the weapon was a wheelgun.

So let me get this straight:

  • 21 year old Army soldier with an M16 and M9 in your train stations or sicced on a foreign populace "over there" = fine
  • Same Army soldier changes out of his uniform at the end of his shift with a weapon = OMG

This is like the AR-15 issue -- in the hands of a uniformed police officer (like, say, an NYPD rookie) an M4 becomes a cuddly "Patrol Rifle" but in the hands of a law abiding citizen it becomes a vile assault weapon, dealer of death, destroyer of worlds, suitable only for killing as many people as possible.

The issue is that both the military and civilian shooting communities would benefit from improved safety training.  Nonetheless, I am convinced that in Joan Peterson's perfect world, even LEOs and military would be disarmed unless patrolling distant countries or bad neighberhoods, far away from her upper middle class wonderbread neighberhood.  Embracing the idea of safety training -- especially that provided by civilians on the free open market -- is just not going to achieve her goals.

I seriously just do not understand what other gun control legislation might have helped short of an outright ban.  The weapon was a wheelgun so no "assault weapon" or "hi cap" issues were involved.  Florida doesn't have permitless open carry so a CCW would be needed to carry the weapon anywhere.  I assume the guy could pass any background check you threw at him, being on orders as a guardsman and all.  I can only conclude that a blanket ban on possession of privately owned firearms -- even for cops and soldiers -- is her ultimate end state.

Astroturfing Veterans?

I just found an interesting group:  Vet Voice.

They claim to be a progressive veteran's organizations and are a 501c3.  Among other issues, they apparently support allowing the attorney general to put people on a secret list which then would deny that individual's right to purchase a firearm from an FFL without any sort of judicial oversight.

Their financials show about half a million of income.  I didn't register for a Guidestar account and I didn't find any further data in Charity Navigator or Open Secrets.

On one hand, this is not surprising.  The US military is a cross section of America.  While the officer corps tends to lean conservative, there are a wide variety of political affiliations in the service.  Moreoever, even among the more conservative types there are a large number of anti-gun rights folks (a mix of "only ones," uninformed individuals who didn't handle weapons regularly in the military, etc).  It is not unreasonable for a relatively tiny organization like this to spring up.  I mean, Wounded Warrior Project pulled in $40 million.  A couple hundred thousand is a drop in the bucket.

Still, I would be interested to see where that funding is coming from, and exactly how many members are part of the project.  I would not be surprised in the least to find Joyce footing a substantial part of the bill and that total membership is at most a few dozen.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Gun Shopping Wishlist

I'm feeling a bit of an itch for a new firearm for 2013 once I finish paying myself back for the side by side (I blew most of 2012's budget on the SxS and an AR upper).  Not sure what I want the project to be.  I've got a couple of thoughts, though.

TRANSITION FROM 357 TO 44

I'm currently fairly well vested in the .357 caliber, with a matching revolver and 1894 carbine.  The trouble is thus:  .357 is too expensive too shoot casually (might as well plink with 5.56 if I'm going to shoot centerfire) but too light for most big game hunting applications.  I like the light weight of the 1894; it is fully 2-3 lbs lighter than my 1895 45-70.  That theoretically makes it a decent brush gun, but I worry about the terminal performance of the .357 on medium sized game.  I'd really prefer a .44 which I trust to handle deer, hogs, and black bears.

The issue is that my .357 is a sweet rifle.  I've had the action worked on by Wild West Guns, had the stainless finish bead blasted, and put ghost ring sights on there.  I figure by the time I sell my GP-100 and the rifle and replace them with counterparts in .44 I'll be out a few hundred bucks.  Plus, not living in Anchorage anymore, it'd be tough to have WWG polish it up for me.

Still, this is probably one of the more practical things I could do.  The .357 is sitting in a pretty awkward place in my safe right now.

37 MM THUMPER

I recently discovered that it is totally legal for civilians to purchase 37 mm flare guns.  In fact they are not even Title I firearms.  I can't think of a practical purpose for such a toy other than "Because F You" and celebrating the Fourth of July in style,  but how awesome would it be to have a fricking M203 look alike mounted beneath an AR, or a standalone "thumper?"  I figure the HAVOC system from Spikes will be about $600 to put together, then a new AR upper to set up as a "grenadier" rifle would be around $600 as well.

TRANSITION FROM 40 SW TO 9MM

I kind of want to go from 40 to 9.  Heather doesn't.  So I don't see this happening.  It is a low priority anyways given the amount we have invested in 40 right now already.

ULTIMATE HOUSE RIFLE

I'd be very interested in a suppressed short barreled AR in either 5.56 or 300 blackout.  This requires the NFA route, obviously.  I already have the surefire and aimpoint.

CARBINE CONVERSION KIT FOR CARRY HANDGUN

I'd be interested in something which is not a title 1 firearm which can be left in my vehicle's bail out bag, like a Roni conversion kit.  The issue is that there are no such conversion kits for the S&W M&P right now.

So, I'd either have to (A) move to the Glock platform or (B) get one for the Beretta (which I carry sometimes) or (C) move to the 1911 platform and thus the .45 ACP.  The RONI has a 16" BBL non-NFA Glock and Sig variety; Mech-Tech makes kits for the Glock and 1911.  The Beretta would require an NFA tax stamp.

FIGHTING SHOTGUN

Either a Saiga or a Mossberg 500 with 18.5" BBL, ghost ring sights, adjustable stock, weapon mounted light, and side saddle.  The trouble is getting that in 20 gauge.  I have little desire to add yet another type of ammunition to my shopping list.


.22 LR HANDGUN

Other than our Uberti (range toy), we don't have a .22 LR handgun right now.  I'd either like a nice hunting-style revolver like the Single Six or a basic semiauto for plinking and new shooter introduction.  I think this is a pracical choice that would get a lot of use.


STANDARDIZED RIFLE CALIBER FOR DW AND ME

We have managed to acquire seven different center fire rifle calibers, plus .22 LR and the .357 carbine.  Right now I have rifles in 45-70, 308, 5.56, 7.62x39, and 7.62x54R.  Heather has rifles in 30-30 and 30-06.  Obviously this complicates logistics, whether it be stockpiling ammo in bulk purchases or just having to bring two boxes of different ammo up to the tree stand.

I love my 45-70.  It is a sweet rifle in a great chambering.  Heather, on the other hand, does not particularly seem to love her 30-30, but she doesn't really want a 45-70.  So I think the lever gun territory is not a great place to standardize.

Likewise, I am too much of a wimp for 30-06.  DW got it for brown bears, and I don't see the slight advantage in oomph to be worth the bulk in the rifle and the increased recoil over 308.  So I don't see myself getting a 30-06 rifle.

I consider my Mosin to be a range toy.  Plus the same issues with 30-06 pop up with the 7.62x54R.  Next.

The 7.62x39 is a decent caliber to standardize on.  Ballistically the round is a lot like the 30-30.  That would make it work ok for deer hunting with proper bullet selection.  The issue I have is that while I think the AK platform is ok, I'm not a huge fan.  Bolt action designs in the 7.62x39 exist (CZ and Savage) but are a bit harder to come by.

The 5.56 would also be a decent caliber to standardize one.  The AR, after all, is my go-to home defense rifle, I have a fair amount of training on the platform, I like the light recoil of the round, and I stockpile 5.56 deep already.  The issue here is that Heather is not a huge AR fan.  There are some inexpensive 5.56/.223 bolt guns -- most notably the Savage Axis and the Mossberg MVP.  The MVP would be a no brainer if it were set up like a "cub scout," with iron sights and an option for a forward mounted scope.  I could also put together a nice 20" bbl AR tricked out for longer range high-power type stuff.  The biggest issue with .223 is that I think it is marginal on deer sized game.  While I'm sure that modern bullet designs are capable of taking deer, it would still not be my first choice.

The .308/7.62 NATO is another great caliber.  I have a few rifles in this caliber and really like the variety of options.  Right now I'm shooting reduced power loads that recoil very softly and perform a lot like 30-30 -- perfect for small deer and hogs.  With other loadings I'd feel very comfortable taking mule deer, caribou, sheep, pretty much anything other than brown bear or bison.  There are obviously a ton of great rifles in this caliber, from Saigas (AK style) to the Axis (cheap bolt gun) to M1As (battle rifles) to a ton of expensive bolt guns, the sky is the limit on price there.  I would not be upset about adding a Ruger Scout rifle, M1A, or other bolt gun with decent optic in 308.

While not super pressing or practical, I would like to have a pair of rifles that match for us.

\\

I'm not going to "pull the trigger" on anything until well into next year, but it is nice to start thinking about the next project!

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Kodiak - 5 months


Hard to believe how fast she's grown!  We're done with puppy shots and initial vet visits, so she hasn't been weighed in about a month, but I'm pretty sure she's 20lbs now!  About 15" high at the shoulder.  She'll probably gain another 10 lbs or so and 2-3".


She's pretty good on recall, except for in really distracting situations.  She's got Lie Down, Shake, and Kennel Up mastered and is getting very good at a near Hold as well.  She loves to run, but has poor leash manners as far as pulling goes.  That's something I'm going to work on once Chris is gone and I have time to do a class with her.  Her house manners have been much improved - she clearly knows right from wrong now, and we've been disciplining a bit for wrong choices.  She's a fast learner on that front!  I don't think she's tried to hop the babygate (to obtain delicious cat poop, gross) once since I pinned her after her last try.


Our biggest problem right now is water entry.  She can swim (as we discovered the other day when she leaped off a boat dock thinking that water lillies were a solid surface), but hates to and won't go in deep of her own volition.  Come October, we're going to start going to NAVHDA training days and I'm hoping to work on that there.

We need to get her on pigeons again, so that we can do gun intro.  Given that we live within hearing distance of a range, I don't think that will be problematic at all.  I'm going to work on getting home before 5 sometime this week so I can swing by the pigeon factory before they close.  We've also found an area that supposedly has quail and that we can hunt, but they only let you hunt a very small area at a time.  I don't know that I'll take her out there much till after deer season, anyway.  Some folks are a little trigger happy...

We went on a small camping trip the other day (which is a story in and of itself), but it was a chance for her to experience a tent.  Let's just say we need to work on that.  I think I got about two hours sleep because she was convinced that tent=happyfuntime, not tent=sleeptime.

Alaska to locally stockpile food again!

So reports Excite News:

The state plans two food stockpiles in or near Fairbanks and Anchorage, two cities that also have military bases. Construction on the two storage facilities will begin this fall, and the first food deliveries are targeted for December. The goal is to have enough food to feed 40,000 people for up to a week, including three days of ready-to-eat meals and four days of bulk food that can be prepared and cooked for large groups. To put that number into perspective, Alaska's largest city, Anchorage, has about 295,000 people, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, and Juneau, its third largest, about 31,000.

As I've previously discussed, Alaska's federal emergency food supplies are in Oregon.  For a state which is very earthquake prone and which has limited transportation infrastructure that seems like a bad idea.  The #1 disaster I can imagine is an earthquake + tsunami in the middle of winter.  There are at least two chokepoints on the highway between Anchorage and Fairbanks where if the bridges drop then there is simply no reasonable land-based workaround.  While there are C-17s at JBER and JBLM (in Washington) trying to support the whole state from air while the port facilities in Anchorage and Seward along with the rail line and highway are restored after a big earthquake would be a large undertaking.

The local food storage proposed, while clearly not enough to sustain all of Anchorage, are a good start.  At a minimum such stores provide an ability to provide for the most needy, least prepared, and unfortunate.  They can limit the amount of airdrop supplies needed in the aftermath of an earthquake.

I saw a figure of around $5 million bandied about for the food storage budget.  For 560,000 servings of food that's about $10/serving.  It seems a bit pricey to me, although if that includes construction and storage costs for the MREs and bulk food then I guess it is a bit more reasonable.

There's also some other efforts which seem smart:


Over the past year, the state has acquired or purchased water purification units and generators designed to work in cold climates, including units that could power facilities like hospitals, Madden said. Officials also are determining what the state needs in terms of emergency medical supplies and shelter, he said.



Saturday, September 1, 2012

Who's for lunch?

I had Friday off and during the course of my day had two possibly self defense type encounters.  I wanted to share them to extract a few lessons learned.

During my day off I had an appointment in a gun free zone.  So, I (lawfully) left my sidearm in the car.  Once I finished my business in the victim disarmament zone, I decided to go out for lunch as I was already downtown.  So I got my car and drove over to my favorite local restaurant, which happens to be a new, nice, classy joint in the middle of a decaying sketchy downtown area.   Initially I stayed disarmed; the state we're currently living in doesn't have "restaurant carry."  I saw that the restaurant didn't open for lunch for another half hour or so, and I decided to kill some time downtown.

I started to stroll off, then I thought to myself:  "Baaaaa" (sheep-like bleating, for those of you on closed captioning at home):
If you are a warrior who is legally authorized to carry a weapon and you step outside without that weapon, then you become a sheep, pretending that the bad man will not come today. No one can be “on” 24/7 for a lifetime. Everyone needs down time. But if you are authorized to carry a weapon, and you walk outside without it, just take a deep breath, and say this to yourself... “Baa.” - Dave Grossman
So I return to the car and pick up my S&W M&P compact (10 rounds, condition 3 as I was doing administrative gun handling in the car) and spare mag (15).  I holstered up but did not chamber a round (administrative gun handling in public and in the car makes me nervous).  I'm glad I did (although I would have preferred to be in condition one).

I then go for my stroll down main street.  It is broad daylight at about 1100 on a sunny Friday.  I do not consider it particularly high risk; while the downtown is decaying, the main drag is actually patrolled by police and they haven't abandoned it to the meth-labs like some of the outlying residential areas and really rough downtown neighborhoods.  I figure I'll swing by the civic center and performing arts center and see if there are any interesting shows coming up and maybe window shop a bit until the restaurant opened for lunch, at which time I would swing back by the car, drop off the gun, and have a delicious sammich.

Encounter One:  As I'm strolling by an antiques shop (closed), a young 30s/high 20s aged woman is loitering out in front.  She's dressed casually, with baggy clothes; not very well kept.  The woman steps out in the sidewalk and engages me verbally at about 8 yards distance, "Hey, when's this antiques shop opening back up?"  Meanwhile a dude steps out of the recessed shop entry, strolling down the side of the antiques shop towards me, hands in pockets, eyeing me intently.  I go from "yellow" to "orange."  This looks sketchy.

I step back, blade, say, "No, I don't know, later" while watching the dude.  As I blade and start eyeing him, he stops his forward motion.  I then glance over my shoulder, see the street is clear, and immediately cross the street while keeping them in my line of sight.  They do not follow and slink back to the recessed entryway to the antiques shop.

In hindsight, the shaded recessed entry way to the antiques shop looks a lot like an ambush zone.  I'm glad I didn't enter the ambush zone.

As an after action review, I think I handled this ok.  You can't avoid getting within 7 yards of every stranger on the street in a downtown area.  I had the SA to identify the "kill zone" (shaded entryway) and I also noticed the semi-hidden threat (quiet larger male trying to flank me).  I avoided entering the kill zone, I didn't take the verbal bait and get distracted, I kept track of the man, and I preserved an escape option to get away.

Encounter Two:  I see someone else loitering dressed in an "urban" manner (baggy pants, ball cap, etc).  I am still unnerved from the first encounter and just pre-emptively cross the street.  At this point a police car cruises slowly down the street.  Both sets of loiterers (encounter 1 & 2) find somewhere else to be, turning away from the street and walking towards alleys.

Maybe this was an overreaction, maybe not.  As an after action point, at this point I subconsciously realized the threat.  It wasn't until later, when I was thinking about it while eating lunch, that I thought, "Hrm...  In the middle of the day on Friday, most legit folks are in school or at work.  People who are dressed like urban thugs, who are loitering on the street in the middle of the work/school day are sketchy."  Call that stereotyping or whatever but there is a ring of truth to it.  Guy in suit walking with a purpose down the street?  Office worker out for lunch.  Mom with kids?  Not a threat.  Young guy dressed like a thug loitering during the school day?  Unemployed jit.

Encounter Three:  Having checked the schedule at the civic center, I walk back to my restaurant, which opens in like 10-15 minutes.  For some reason, in retrospect, the police patrol and scurrying of cockroaches reassured me for no good reason.  Rather than going back to my car to wait (smart), I sit down at a table in front of the restaurant in their street/outdoor seating area and pull out my kindle to read (stupid).

Luckily I keep some SA while reading and am glancing around every page or so.  I'm glad I did.  On the other side of the street and offset about 10 yards is an alleyway.  Two fine upstanding youths (older teenagers maybe?  I pegged them at 17-20 or so in age) dressed in an "urban" style turn the corner of the alley as I glance up from my book.  They are walking side by side.  They see me and one says something to the other.  They then break from walking side by side and one drifts back and off to the side a few paces.

Instead of staying on their side of the street, they both make a beeline across the street at an angle right towards me.  They are staring intently and walking fast.  The leader is wearing a tight wifebeater but I see a clip (knife?) in his front pocket.  The trailer has hands tucked in baggy pockets and has a big baggy jersey-type shirt on.  I go from yellow to orange.  When they're about halfway across the street I stand up from my bistro table.  At about seven paces I get my hands in the interview position, blade with the table between us, and say, "What's up, guys?"  I am moving to condition red and think, "self, if they take another step I need to tell them to HALT and if they keep coming I need to draw my M&P.  Shit."

Luckily at this point they take another step, the leader sizes me up and mumbles, "wassup, man?" and alters course up the street and away from me, slowing pace to an amble and walking in the middle of the street.  The trailer throws a long lingering glance over the shoulder at me, and I remain bladed and staring at them.

As an after action, I made a bunch of mistakes here.  First off, I did not absorb the lessons of the first encounters.  This was the first time I had been downtown during mid-day on a work day.  I should have realized from the first two encounters that it was sketchy as heck and gone back to my car.  Instead, I let myself be lulled back into a false sense of security by the bright sunny day, the sight of a patrol cruiser driving by, and the presence of a private rent-a-cop inside a medical facility about 500 yards away down the street, even though at the moment in time neither the LEOs nor the rent-a-cop had line of sight to me.

Next, I "won" the victim selection lottery.  If you are a pair of hungry urban boars cruising downtown, what does a single reasonably clean cut white guy sitting in front of the most expensive restaurant in a bad downtown area fiddling with an electronic device look like?  This is what it looks like:


I looked like lunch.

Finally, I waited too long to confront the duo.  A typical street is probably about 10 yards across.  My sidewalk gave me another 2 yards or so of distance.  Based on the tueller drill, I'd need to be bladed and in condition red, ready to draw and fire when they were at 7 yards distance, i.e., when they crossed the mid-point of the street.  Heck, based on being in condition 3 (no round in the pipe) I needed to pad that distance even more.  I did not begin my verbal challenge until they were at that point.

I needed to politely challenge (like I did, soft words) as they vectored towards me across the street, hard challenge (hard words -- "stop right there!") as they hit the mid point of the street, and be ready to start a draw stroke shortly thereafter.  Had they continued on, my "hard words" would have been at about 5 yards and my draw stroke would have been as the lead guy was hitting the sidewalk edge.  I waited way too late to determine their intent.

As a post-script, I did not follow up with law enforcement.  I should have immediately gone into the restaurant and called the police.  Nothing criminal occurred but I definitely felt like I was being hunted.  I don't want to be the guy who calls wolf but I definitely felt threatened.  I didn't have my phone on me but I could have used one in the restaurant.  There was a police unit within 10 minutes (I had just seen one cruising by) and they could have checked out the guys.

On the plus side, my aggressive body language and SA seemed to have warded off a few negative encounters.  I did not have to display or use my sidearm but I was very glad to have it there, and I think having it helped me take an aggressive stance.  As a note, I did not intentionally go into a dangerous environment because I was armed.  Remember, I almost did all of this without saddling up but it was only the habit I have established that got me to go back to the car to pick up the M&P.  I genuinely thought that the middle of main street on a bright sunny afternoon would be ok and reasonably safe.  While I wouldn't go down there after dark, it seemed ok in broad daylight.  This was also the first time I'd cruised downtown alone.  It wasn't until I'd really assimilated the encounters that I changed my assessment.

I'm still picking these incidents over but wanted to get the initial thoughts out while they were still fresh in my mind.  Typing this out, the first and third incidents seem way sketchier and I really regret not contacting law enforcement.